Five steps approach

Analysis of practical cases has revealed that five steps are invariably taken when developing Building with Nature Designs. The steps together outline a basic creative process that can be followed in any phase of the project realisation process.

Five basic steps for generating BwN Design ideas

Step 1. Understand the system

Acquire a better understanding of the system in which a project is planned. In depth knowledge of the physical system (biotic and a-biotic), as well as the socio-economic system and the governance context are crucial to identify potential win-win solutions.

  • The system to be considered depends on the project objectives: Be clear about the primary objectives and realise that finding win-win solutions creates room for flexibility in catering for secondary objectives. Note that looking at the primary objective alone may restrict the system to be considered. Adding secondary objectives will force consideration of other system characteristics: other temporal and spatial scales etc.
  • Information about the system at hand can be derived from various sources: It is important to realise is that acquiring knowledge about a system is not a prerogative of scientists. Valuable information can be found everywhere, for instance by
    • talking to people with local knowledge (fishermen, harbourmasters, waiters, elderly people, etc)
    • delving into historical records to better understand the evolution of the system as a whole and to think of approaches that build on historically available expertise
  • Think multifunctional: Remember to look for user functions beyond those covered by the primary objective.

Step 2. Identify realistic alternatives

Identify realistic alternatives that provide true win-win solutions providing services beyond mitigation and compensation, alternatives that make maximum use of the system’s potential (physical, socio-economical and governance-wise) while safeguarding or even enhancing sustainability.

  • Building with Nature Designs take an inverted perspective: Turn a traditional reactive perspective into a proactive one (problems are opportunities). This may lead to genuine eye-openers. One way to come up with such innovative ‘inverse’ ideas is to answer a number of basic questions:
    • Delivering services to the ecosystem:  How can we strengthen the functioning of the receiving system (ecology, recreation, landscape)?
      • Larger scale: how can a project deliver benefits to the overall system in which it resides?
      • Smaller scale: how can the project (with small adaptations) be more eco-friendly?
    • Utilizing services provided by the ecosystem:  How can better use be made of locally active (natural) resources: tide, waves, gradients, sediment availability, flora, fauna, economy, cultural values, etc?
      • Can available resources be utilized to lower construction and maintenance costs (more flexible solutions)?
      • Can available resources be utilized to come to more sustainable solutions (PPP solutions: less energy, less material, multi functional)?
      • Can the system’s dynamics be used as a positive rather than a negative aspect (utilising natural forces and expected changes as a means to achieve one’s goals, use available time to achieve necessary change gradually rather than at once with associated over-engineering)?
  • Solutions are transdisciplinary from the start: Involve academic experts, field practitioners, community members, business owners, decision makers and other stakeholders in the formulation of alternatives.
    • Involve all relevant disciplines in the design process as soon as possible (which disciplines should collaborate given the system at hand, how should they collaborate in order to be most innovative/effective)
    • Seek open-minded rationality, open to the unknown, the unexpected and the unforeseeable while rejecting dogmatism, ideology and intolerance (see also Wikipedia: Transdisciplinary studies).

Step 3. Valuate the qualities of alternatives and pre-select an integral solution

Assess the inherent qualities of the alternatives and combine them into one optimal integral solution. Valuate the BwN alternatives and compare them with traditional designs.

  • More value does not imply higher construction cost: When looking for win-win situations, small adjustments to an existing design may produce more value for less or equal money.
    • More for less is possible! Try to get great value gain with little investment.
  • Creativity pays off: Dare to embrace innovative ideas, test them and show how they work out in practical examples.
    • Tell the story of successful implementation of creativity
  • Uncertainties must be identified and handled: Building with Nature solutions by definition involve natural dynamics and inherent uncertainties. Handling these uncertainties is a normal part of the Building with Nature Design process.
    • Remember that, although a solution as a whole may be innovative, its components may be based on traditional know how.
  • Involve stakeholders in the valuation and selection process: From Negative to Positive, from NIMBY (not in my back yard) to PIMBY (please in my back yard)!
  • Perform a cost-benefit analysis: Take into consideration construction costs and maintenance costs, as well as benefits for all functions involved. Compare the BwN-solution with a traditional (usually mono-functional) one.

Step 4. Elaborate selected alternatives.

Elaborate selected alternatives considering practical restrictions and governance context.

  • Consider the conditions/restrictions provided by the project: Make sure that an innovative idea is elaborated in such a way, that it may actually be constructed.
    • Take execution aspects into account (work methods, availability of equipment, etc)
    • Identify important timing aspects (growing seasons, closed seasons, time for ecological components to evolve to desired state, etc.)
    • Tell the story. If you have proceeded to implement an innovative idea, make sure that you tell your story to the project team, the stakeholders and the public. Think of access routes to a project, guided excursions, information panels, press releases, media coverage, etc.
  • Implementation of solutions requires involvement of a network of actors and stakeholders: such a network needs to be established
    • Effectively involve stakeholders in the design and realisation process
    • Use existing examples that people can use as inspiration, as building blocks for future projects. Solutions should be of an ‘open source’ nature. In networks ideas cannot and should not be protected, but open to use by others. Share costs, expertise and ideas. Don’t be possessive.

Step 5. Prepare the solution for implementation in the next phase on the road to realisation

Handle the practical bottlenecks to get the solution included in the next phase on the road to realisation: inclusion in request for proposals, inclusion in the detailed design, inclusion in the project delivery, inclusion in maintenance and monitoring scheme.

  • Translate solution to a technical design: What would you need to actually implement the proposed solution (lacking knowledge, available materials, sustainability criteria etc.).
  • Translate solution to request for proposals or contract: How to reformulate the request for proposals (TOR) so that the innovative solution will be proposed or constructed.
  • Organise required funding: Try to involve stakeholders in the search for additional funding if required.
  • Identify permitting requirements: Identify as soon as possible potential bottlenecks in terms of permitting and organise necessary input (required knowledge, required support by stakeholders).
  • Prepare risk analysis and contingency plans: Building with Nature is dynamic almost by definition. Make sure the project takes this aspect into consideration (adaptive execution, adaptive management)