Skip to the content
- Anonymous, Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market – Part II. 2003, Report: EUR 20418 EN/2, European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra.
- Forbes TL, Forbes VE. 1993. A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology. Funct Ecol 7: 249-254.
- Forbes VE, Calow P, Sibly RM. 2001. Are current species extrapolation models a good basis for ecological risk assessment? Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20: 442-447.
- Hose GC, Van den Brink PJ. 2004. Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 47: 511-520.
- Karman CC. 2000. The Role of Time in Environmental Risk Assessment: Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 6:159-164.
- Smit MGD, Holthaus KIE, Trannum HC, Neff JM, Kjeilen-Eilertsen G, Jak RG, Singsaas I, Huijbregts MAJ, Hendriks AJ. 2008a. Species sensitivity distributions for suspended clays, sediment burial, and grain size change in the marine environment: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27:1006-1012.
- Smit MG, Ebbens E, Jak RG, Huijbregts MA. 2008c. Time and concentration dependency in the potentially affected fraction of species: The case of hydrogen peroxide treatment of ballast water: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27:746-753.